Lol no. To all their friends they’ll say: ”yeah I know it’s not legit, it’s some weird thing dad hacked there for some reason. I want to have a real one but he won’t install it idk”
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Linux@lemmy.ml•Wayback: A Wayland replacement for the whole X11 server39·1 month agodeleted by creator
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•"Recommended System Requirements" for buying a used PC for selfhostingEnglish2·2 months agoOr maybe it pops the link out of the browser into a dedicated media player which has decent codec support.
I think this is exactly what it does.
With iDevices no luck with mkv’s if I remember right, but not sure if I have even tested one. Most my files are mp4 x264.
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•"Recommended System Requirements" for buying a used PC for selfhostingEnglish2·2 months agoMostly using the ”browser” (so shitty that you can barely call it one) on my LG smart TV, and sometimes some iDevices, but I’ll consider myself lucky with codecs then. Even mkv’s play on LG without hiccups. Only small thing I miss are subtitles which these devices do not seem to support, even if I’d mux them in as a track.
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•"Recommended System Requirements" for buying a used PC for selfhostingEnglish2·2 months agoSomeone should explain me why transcoding is even needed (other than in case bandwidth is an issue)? My ”media server” at the moment is a custom ffmpeg script to edit all x264 mp4 files it finds by moving the moov atom to the beginning of the file (and what ever the similar thing for x265 was), and then lighttpd to serve them via dir listing. No file has yet had playback issues even over the internet…
Nice, but the bots may not understand the joke.
And not only that but they will tag the domain with ”there is something here”, and maybe some day someone will take a closer look and see if you are all up-to-date or would there maybe be a way in. So better to just drop everything and maybe also ban the IP if they happen to try poke some commonly scanned things (like /wp-admin, /git, port 22 etc.) GoAccess is a pretty nice tool to show you what they are after.
Not at hand no, but I’m sure any of the LLMs can guide you through the setup if googling does not give anything good.
Nothing very special about all this, well maybe the subdir does require some extra spells to reverse proxy config.
Use a reverse proxy (caddy or nginx proxy manager) with a subdomain, like myservice.mydomain.com (maybe even configure a subdir too, so …domain.com/guessthis/). Don’t put anything on the main domain / root dir / the IP address.
If you’re still unsure setup Knockd to whitelist only IP addresses that touch certain one or two random ports first.
So security through obscurity :) But good luck for the bots to figure all that out.
VPN is of course the actually secure option, I’d vote for Tailscale.
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Technology@beehaw.org•Why are newer versions of Windows considered spyware?2·2 months agodeleted by creator
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•[SOLVED] ELI5: How to put several servers on one external IP?English2·2 months agoCould be indeed. Looking at the nginx logs, setting a permaban on trying to access /git and a couple of others might catch 99% of bots too. And ssh port ban trigger (using knockd for example) is also pretty powerful yet safe.
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•[SOLVED] ELI5: How to put several servers on one external IP?English4·2 months agoI have wrestled with the same thing as you and I think nginx reverse proxy and subdomains are reasonably good solution:
- nothing answers from www.mydomain.com or mydomain.com or ip:port.
- I have subdomains like service.mydomain.com and letsencrypt gives them certs.
- some services even use a dir, so only service.mydomain.com/something will get you there but nothing else.
- keep the services updated and using good passwords & non-default usernames.
- Planned: instant IP ban to anything that touches port 80/443 without using proper subdomain (whitelisting letsencrypt ofc), same with ssh port and other commonly scanner ones. Using fail2ban reading nginx logs for example.
- Planned: geofencing some ip ranges, auto-updating from public botnet lists.
- Planned: wildcard TLS cert (*.mydomain.com) so that the subdomains are not listed anywhere maybe even Cloudflare tunnel with this.
Only fault I’ve discovered are some public ledgers of TLS certs, where the certs given by letsencrypt spill out those semi-secret subdomains to the world. I seem to get very little to no bots knocking my services though so maybe those are not being scraped that much.
hietsu@sopuli.xyzto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Jeff Geerling: Self-hosting your own media considered harmful (updated). Youtube removed his content, saying that self hosting content is "dangerous or harmful content"English254·2 months agoSaw the video… It mentions ”ripping” and even shows clips of some blockbuster movies. No wonder any copyright-sensitive automation gets triggered pretty fast. This will only get worse.
It’s most likely a dumb PR stunt from the rapper. At least a similar message displayed on the car screen was easily forged by a hackernews commenter, can’t imagine why a letter like this (with old title) wouldn’t be. We live in the age of LLMs.