How would you stop them from doing this?

By dismantling as much of the power structure as I can. As often as I can.

Burn.

It

All

Down.

The problem is that government even has the power to do those things.

And to paraphrase you, you can’t solve government problems with more government, I’m sorry, man.

Rofl. Your god can eat a dick. I’ve seen exactly what your god does.

It’s easier to start a competing company than it is to start a competing government.

You need a powerful standing army for the latter, and standing armies are part of why we’re in the trouble we’re in.

How naive can you be? You think your vote matters here?

When every single district has been gerrymandered to death for 100 years, nobody’s vote really matters anymore.

So you want Trump and MAGA politicians to be able to deny your payments instead?

The problem with “just let the government do it” is when the government is run by people like this.

My folks had a tape backup system in the late 1990s. It used 250MB tapes.

They’ve been around for decades.

zfs list shows datasets.

zpool list shows pools.

mirror is a type of pool.

Winwar 2 was based on a dos version of it, btw. I played it all the time with some friends back in the early 1990s.

You sure that’s what is happening, and it’s not just mounting a different snapshot/dataset being mounted “on top” ?

I’ve seen it happen, which is why I ask. Assume the root dataset is named pool0 and has set0 set1 and set1/set2 as child datasets.

Their mount points are as follows:

/pool0/set0

/pool0/set1

/pool0/set1/set2

Now, if somehow, say set2 gets unmounted.temporarily, and you save files to /pool0/set1/set2 while the data set is not mounted, it’ll actually put those files in the set1 dataset, under the set2 directory.

But, when you mount the pool0/set1/set2 dataset again, the files under the set1 dataset are hidden by the set2 child.

Am I explaining it well enough for you to follow along?

Make sure you don’t have some similar situation by temporarily unmounting any nested datasets and ls’ing their mount points.

My network actually ran better when my OpnSense was virtualized on a Proxmox server running atop a Dell Optiplex 790 MT from like 2013, than it is currently on a bare metal Sophos SG-135v2.

But that is because the sophos has 8 ports. And all 8 are a separate interface, so to use them as a switch requires bridging 7 of the 8.

And that slows things down tremendously. I really just need an 8 port switch in there, I guess.

The upshot is, the sophos came with rack mounts.

cries in broke

I have 4x3TiB drives in a currently-degraded RAIDZ1 due to a hard drive failure. I have a replacement coming, and my fingers are crossed that I don’t lose another drive beforehand.

I tried tdarr, but have issues using more than one node. I may just wind up installing docker on my more powerful desktop specifically for tdarr, instead of on the proxmox server I have without a real gpu. (It’s a Xeon Supermicro board with their onboard VGA)

That I’m not sure of, I know MASS uses snapcast internally, and can stream to LMS/squeezelite players.

I also wouldn’t call it 100% flawless, but it works well enough for me.

My favorite use case for MASS is my desktop PC, in our bedroom, has a decent 5.1 sound system, and is running squeezelite.

I have an alarm automation that starts playing from the random 500 playlist.

When my phone connects to my car’s Bluetooth, it transfers the queue to my phone, which is running snapcast on a VPN.

When my phone disconnects from my Bluetooth, and I am at home, it transfers any queue from my phone back to my desktop.

If I’m not at home it just stops the music, otherwise it’ll start playing through the phone speakers.

While at work, I’ll use Ultrasonic rather than music assistant, because my data inside my work area is sporadic, and not conducive to a good musical experience with how MASS streams.

I’m close to a TB myself. For me, I’m a bit of a “completionist” and can’t stand having just 2 or 3 tracks from an entire album. Every track I have is accompanied by the rest of the album it was released on.

Sure, it means there are some duplicates at times, but it’s worth it to me.

Damn, and I thought my 30k plus tracks was pretty large. I use Navidrome as a server and slskd as well

Hello fellow hass/mass user. Also, what sort of low voltage?

Fire/security alarms? Or access control? (Or both)?

I do both, as well as CCTV.

Ultrasonic works fine for me, on my pixel9 with Navidrome. Plays in the background just fine as well.

Wait. There’s a strawberry for Android? I use it on my PC…

Yeah, but my wife and kid also use it, and they’re not going to be happy if I change things.