• алсааас [she/they]
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    snaps are a proprietary vendor-locked format, the only redeeming quality is being able to run them in cli (once Flatpak get that too, there is no valid reason for snaps to exist).

    I just find it midly infuriating (if that even is a thing, meaning I hate it but it’s not that significant for me to distro hop on my work laptop) to have two “universal” package formats on my system with Canonical shoving the objectively worse one (from a free/libre pov) down my throat…

    • ReCursing
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      I’ve used flatpak only once, but I am pretty sure I ran it through the cli. Did I imagine that? i might have imagined that, it was a while ago

      • алсааас [she/they]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        no you didn’t, you can install flatpak using the terminal but iirc flatpak are mostly made with GUI applications in mind, while snaps support installing command line utils quite well

      • алсааас [she/they]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        …no?

        The backend is proprietary and you or other orgs cannot run their own server. It’s harcoded to use Canonical’s servers for obtaining snaps and their metadata…

        seething Ubuntu fans are funny af lol.
        Your leash being longer than average doesn’t remedy the fact that you’re still tied to a pole…