@hypnotic_nerd@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 1 year agoGitHub Desktop or Git CLI?programming.devimagemessage-square177fedilinkarrow-up1503arrow-down130
arrow-up1473arrow-down1imageGitHub Desktop or Git CLI?programming.dev@hypnotic_nerd@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square177fedilink
minus-squareRikudou_SagelinkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-21 year agoMust be an interesting work if you never add, commit or push. Edit: How the hell did you get the repo without clone?
minus-square@xmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink9•1 year agoPshaw, real programmers write out the contents of .git by hand. (Also, it was a joke, the last two commands I listed are ones you’ll ideally never need in your life)
minus-square@Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.comlinkfedilink5•1 year agoreflog saved my life once after a stupid misshap. All rebase are belong to us (onto, rebase, and ofc interactive) but what’s fsck (I don’t squash personally)?
minus-square@xmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink3•1 year agoFsck is File System Check - realistically you should never need to use it.
Nah,
rebase -i
,squash
,fsck
andreflog
Must be an interesting work if you never
add
,commit
orpush
.Edit: How the hell did you get the repo without
clone
?Pshaw, real programmers write out the contents of
.git
by hand.(Also, it was a joke, the last two commands I listed are ones you’ll ideally never need in your life)
reflog saved my life once after a stupid misshap.
All rebase are belong to us (onto, rebase, and ofc interactive) but what’s fsck (I don’t squash personally)?
Fsck is File System Check - realistically you should never need to use it.