• King
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -121 year ago

      Youre the one begging them for free content here, stuff costs money get a job bum

        • King
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No youtube for you then, being disabled doesnt mean the universe owns you free videos and you can insult others for reminding you that stuff costs money

          Edit money not even required just watch ads, the entitlement jesus

            • King
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              says the guy who insults me because he thinks universe owns him free videos for getting him disabled

            • King
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Yeah bro just wanted to hear it, u cant help it with some people. " aakshually i cant walk no job for me so give me youtube" then u get called unpleasant for not agreeing

      • @drkt@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I literally don’t have a job and host a website with 249971 requests served april-october. This shit isn’t expensive, google makes it expensive. Before YouTube we just had other websites with videos.

        e: I got it wrong, it’s 525154 (valid) requests april-october with 85340 unique IPs after filtering my own.

        • King
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Videos always existed on internet” People upload 500 hours of video to youtube per minute how simpleminded are you Jesus Christ

          • @drkt@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Because it’s the video platform, King.

            By your logic, my website shouldn’t exist because it’s too expensive. By your logic, videos didn’t exist before YouTube. You are at odds with reality.

            • King
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -31 year ago

              Wow your reading comprehension is astounding, ill try to use as few words as possible, more videos = more money needed to host them

              • @drkt@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                Who was it that told you YouTube was so expensive to run? Google? I couldn’t imagine why the company, with a vested interest in making you think ads are essential, would tell you that YouTube is like super duper totally expensive.

                Please explain to me how it is that my website, despite serving lossless music and video streaming and a photogallery, doesn’t actually cost me anything except the electric bill which is so negligible that I don’t even bother considering it in my low-income no-job budget. I would love to hear why this isn’t possible.

                I, too, remember the days before YouTube where videos literally did not exist on the internet! So innovative of Google, inventing video hosting.

                • @BURN@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Storage isn’t cheap

                  Network bandwidth isn’t cheap

                  Data centers aren’t cheap

                  Add on Electricity, Transcoding, Multiple AZs, Backups, cached content with ISPs and engineer salaries and you’ve got a very expensive system.

                  That’s not even factoring in payments to creators, which are necessary if you want people to make quality content for the platform.

                  Your website serves multiple orders of magnitude less traffic than a single YouTube page. Web costs aren’t linear. It’s an S-Curve where it’s incredibly cheap to get started, but gets exponentially more expensive until you’ve reached some level of critical mass where revenue exceeds costs.

                  Video hosting pre-YouTube was terrible. It barely existed, and it wasn’t accessible. They sure didn’t invent it, but they made it possible for the masses to host video.

                  No other web content platform has taken off since YouTube. There’s a reason for that, and the majority is cost. To reach a widespread audience you have to invest hundreds of millions into infrastructure. Same reason Twitch still has the critical mass of livestreamers.

                • King
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  I already covered those points in my previous comments: 500 hours uploaded per minute, more videos = more money needed to host them. I can’t dumb it down further, sorry

                  • @drkt@feddit.dk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    What if, and bare with me man I know this is complicated shit, you spread those out a little bit? You know, like it was before Google exterminated independent platforms? I promise you 490 hours of those 500 hours uploaded sits at 3 views for eternity.

                    YouTube was convenient and free before Google bought it, and that’s why we all congregated here. Google then used that power to entrench themselves and now it’s YouTube or nothing. If YouTube is too expensive to host, so be it. Let it die. It’s the internet, someone will make a better version that’s completely free. Peertube already exists and is scalable.