Inductor to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 year agoStop doing Computer Sciencefeddit.deimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down173
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageStop doing Computer Sciencefeddit.deInductor to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 1 year agomessage-square124fedilink
minus-square@dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoI mean if the CPU that’s running these instructions is super low power then 0.02 might be worth it
minus-square@Gork@lemm.eelinkfedilink4•1 year agoOr if you’re scaling a large cluster of CPUs for parallel computations where a 0.02% increase can make a tangible difference in runtimes.
minus-square@blackstratAlink2•1 year agoOnly if you’d removed and fixed all other bottlenecks that would gain you more than 0.02%. And I’m not convinced there are many if any projects of any reasonable size where that has been the case.
I mean if the CPU that’s running these instructions is super low power then 0.02 might be worth it
Or if you’re scaling a large cluster of CPUs for parallel computations where a 0.02% increase can make a tangible difference in runtimes.
Only if you’d removed and fixed all other bottlenecks that would gain you more than 0.02%. And I’m not convinced there are many if any projects of any reasonable size where that has been the case.