@Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • edit-21 day agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-square77fedilinkarrow-up1469arrow-down139
arrow-up1430arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.@Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • edit-21 day agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-square@FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink-1•19 hours agoAlmost every tyrannical regime in the 20th century systematically disarmed their citizenry, leading to some of the greatest atrocities the world has ever seen. It’s not a coincidence.
minus-square@breecher@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•3 hours agoThat’s not true, they disarmed their undesirables. However private gun ownership would have done next to nothing in those scenarios anyway.
Almost every tyrannical regime in the 20th century systematically disarmed their citizenry, leading to some of the greatest atrocities the world has ever seen. It’s not a coincidence.
That’s not true, they disarmed their undesirables.
However private gun ownership would have done next to nothing in those scenarios anyway.