1950 feels kind of recent, but 2100 still seems super far off and futuristic.

  • @blackstratA
    link
    410 hours ago

    1950 is around the birth of rock and roll, which seems a long tine ago to me. Seems crazy that my kids might see 2100 though

      • @De_Narm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        310 hours ago

        Damn, I’m about a decade older than you and there’s no way I’d call 1950 recent in any way. For all I care, it’s just as much ancient history as the roman empire. I don’t know anyone alive from either period, at least not on a personal level.

        2100 on the other hand feels closer because I’m expect to come close to it within my lifetime. At least closer than I ever was to 1950.

        • @seaside@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          49 hours ago

          I have family members who were born in the 1920s and 1930s and are still alive today, which probably has a significant influence on my perspective on time.

          • @De_Narm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            29 hours ago

            That’s a fair point. My family isn’t exactly known for getting old. I didn’t even meet half my grandparents and the only one I really got to know only lived into my early teenage years. I’ll probably only get to around 70 myself.

        • @hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          It’s a matter of perspective. When you study ancient history, the French Revolution is basically yesterday. When you don’t, a few of decades ago is nearly primordial times.

          I’m the former, and to me the 50s are very, very recent times.