Leo to Linux@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down14cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
arrow-up144arrow-down1external-linkLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comLeo to Linux@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
minus-square@Gargari@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish13•2 years agoVery sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
minus-squarearouenelinkfedilink6•2 years ago@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
minus-square@oldfart@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•2 years agoIt’s packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there’s anything wrong with just using lxc)
Very sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
It’s packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there’s anything wrong with just using lxc)