• @Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Signal being an American company is also problematic.

      These two are the best balance of security/convenience, however.

      • breadguyyyyyyyyy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        server location and legal jurisdiction shouldn’t matter for any truly secure messenger

          • breadguyyyyyyyyy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            if a messenger is truly 0 trust end to end encryption, it doesn’t matter who owns the servers or the legal protections of data because they won’t have any data anyway. that’s why signal is so good, when they get subpoenaed the only information that they actually have is the last connection and message sent unix times or something. still secure regardless of being in the US and being run on centralized Amazon, google, and cloudflare servers.

            • @Zachariah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              Then the jurisdiction of software development matters. Don’t want a back door being forced into an update by the FBI.

              • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                The FBI can’t just force them to add malicious code. A bad actor could try to contribute bad code, but Signal’s devs would likely catch it.