Now currently I’m not in the workforce, but in the past from my work experience, apprenticeship and temp roles, I’ve always seen ipv4 and not ipv6!

Hell, my ISP seems to exclusively use ipv4 (unless behind nats they’re using ipv6)

Do you think a lot of people stick with the earlier iteration because they have been so familiar with it for a long time?

When you look at a ipv6, it looks menacing with a long string of letters and numbers compared to the more simpler often.

I am aware the IP bucket has gone dry and they gotta bring in a new IP cow with a even bigger bucket, but what do you think? Do you yourself or your firm use ipv4 or 6?

  • We turn it off in our office. It doesn’t benefit us.

    You could also make the argument that ipv4 through NAT is better for privacy since it obfuscate what, and how many devices are connected to where.

    • @tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      When I was first looking into IPv6, people were talking about how you can self-assign an address by simply wrapping an IPv6 address around your MAC address. But that practice seems to have fallen out of favour, and I’m guessing the reason is, as you say, the whole privacy thing? There’s a lot of pushback these days against any tech that makes it easier to fingerprint your connection.

      • @perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That was so insane - “we need a unique number, let’s just use the MAC” - it was like people didn’t even think through any of the implications when making ipv6 address schemes.

        Similar with the address proposals that ignored the need to minimise the size of core internet routing tables.

        • @just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Noobie question, wouldn’t the ISP decide what your outgoing IPv6 address is? Like they do with IPv4? I mean no matter how many times I restart my router, my public IP remains the same so I always thought it was assigned by them.

            • @saiarcot895@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              For reference, in the US, Comcast only gives up to a /60 for residential connections. It’s still fine for most use cases, but it does feel a bit like doing a bit of penny pinching when you’re wondering if you have enough /64’s for how your network is going to be set up.

                • @saiarcot895@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Yeah, fortunately, for my own use cases, /60 is enough, but I can’t think of a good reason for Comcast to not give out /56 since they’re pretty cheap compared to IPv4.

    • @zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      IPv6 has privacy addresses, though. Stuff on my network generates a new random address every day and uses that address for outgoing connections, so you can’t really track individual devices inside my network.

      • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        You can just look at what addresses from that range have left the network in any given 24 hour window.

        If AAAA is constantly reaching our to aussie.zone one day, and the next day AAAB is reaching out to that address you can pretty easily connect the dots.