@aeharding@vger.social to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world • 3 months agoIf you could regulate something relatively inconsequential, what would it be?message-square437fedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1318arrow-down1message-squareIf you could regulate something relatively inconsequential, what would it be?@aeharding@vger.social to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square437fedilinkfile-text
Fitted sheet must have label on bottom right seam Salted butter wrapping text must be red. Unsalted blue.
minus-square@jbk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink48•3 months agoevery date MUST be in RFC 3339 format. e.g. 2024-09-08, with optionally the time: 21:41:24+02:00 and hell no not ISO 8601 cause then people would use stuff like 2024W154
minus-square@nabladabla@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink10•3 months agoThank you! Also nobody wants to buy a copy of an ISO standard
minus-square@iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilink5•3 months agoI think that ISO 8601 is available for free. But agreed that the RFC version is superior.
minus-square@Eiri@lemmy.calinkfedilink3•3 months agoWould you allow long dates? For example, Jan. 11, 2022, or 7 September 2010.
minus-square@jbk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink4•3 months agono, for cross-language interoperability. ok I just noticed that this breaks other calendar systems but well
every date MUST be in RFC 3339 format. e.g. 2024-09-08, with optionally the time: 21:41:24+02:00
and hell no not ISO 8601 cause then people would use stuff like 2024W154
Thank you! Also nobody wants to buy a copy of an ISO standard
I think that ISO 8601 is available for free. But agreed that the RFC version is superior.
Would you allow long dates?
For example, Jan. 11, 2022, or 7 September 2010.
no, for cross-language interoperability. ok I just noticed that this breaks other calendar systems but well