An extreme version of this is: What should the German health service do if someone says they are willing to donate a kidney as long as it doesn’t go to a Jew?

On the one hand, nobody is forced to donate a kidney and by forbidding this we’re making things worse for an innocent patient. On the other hand, it can be seen as the state sanctioning this kind of discrimination.

  • fearout
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Compulsory is a bit much, but an opt-out system would be a good solution.

    • CrimeDad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Hmmm okay, but it has to be difficult to opt-out, kind of like how conscientious objectors have to go through a whole process to get out of military service.

      • @philluminati@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Why shouldn’t people be able to opt out? I opted out. This is my body not yours. We’re not all in this together.

              • @philluminati@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                If you respect someone when they are alive you should respect them in death too. Only a troll would say they’re okay with people fucking their own dead mothers or mocking dead political enemies.

                • @cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  No, because it’s not them any more. It’s just remains. I still respect them the same way as before, the remains simply have no real relation.

                  • @philluminati@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    I find it hard to believe you would genuinely be that composed and detached, if someone ran over your 3yo child and then used their head as a hood ornament for the lols.

                    However, I guess I have to take you at your word.

        • CrimeDad
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Because living people who are sick might need those organs, which would otherwise just go to waste in your corpse. Also, it good to have a steady supply of organs from the deceased in order to avoid perverse and exploitative market situations.

          • @philluminati@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The very fact you raise the possibility of perverse or exploitative markets means there’s cause for mistrust in any donor arrangement. We live in a capitalist world and here you are devaluing my body for who, some CEO? Lisa Marie Presley inherits a catalogue of copyrighted content and revenue streams but my family can’t get a penny for saving someone’s life?

            Organ donation is a wonderful thing and I understand why our systems are “opt-in” by default but why can’t I opt out, if I don’t trust society?

            (Also: https://i.redd.it/9fiy6yw00mcb1.png)

            • CrimeDad
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              You’re kind of talking about different things. Copyright should of course be abolished along with all private property. I don’t rule out compensation to your estate for organs harvested after death and there should definitely be a public bounty/reward system to encourage the living to donate.

              You shouldn’t be able to opt out, or at least it should be very difficult to do so, because when you are dead what you have a say in that affects the living should be very limited, because those organs won’t matter to you anymore, and because those organs might matter very much to living people. Whether you trust society or not doesn’t matter anymore when you are dead.