CDs are in every way better than vinyl records. They are smaller, much higher quality audio, lower noise floor and don’t wear out by being played. The fact that CD sales are behind vinyl is a sign that the world has gone mad. The fact you can rip and stream your own CD media is fantastic because generally remasters are not good and streaming services typically only have remastered versions, not originals. You have no control on streaming services about what version of an album you’re served or whether it’ll still be there tomorrow. Not an issue with physical media.

The vast majority of people listen to music using equipment that produces audio of poor quality, especially those that stream using ear buds. It makes me very sad when people don’t care that what they’re listening to could sound so much better, especially if played through a hifi from a CD player, or using half decent (not beats) headphones.

There’s plenty of good sounding and well produced music out there, but it’s typically played back through the equivalent of two cans and some string. I’m not sure people remember how good good music can sound when played back through good kit.

  • Sneezycat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    This is from the same crew that says eyes can’t see more than 30fps

    • @SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Nope doesn’t even remotely compare. We are talking about diminishing returns. The jump from 30fps to a higher one would be like going from 96kbps to a higher sample rate. The improvement is obvious to virtually everyone.

      A better example would be telling people to discern between any 2 framerates above 144fps.