• алсааас [she/they]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    that’s not a left/right divide. it’s a right/further right divide. And even staunch conservatives follow (neo)liberal economics.

    This is a flow chart from a leftists/socialist perspective

    • @traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      This is a flow chart from a leftist/socialist perspective

      Then you have socialist governments wasting billions of the tax payer money to rescue shitty state owned companies. Look at Portugal with TAP and Efacec. Socialist party, billions of the tax payer money going down the drain. Those companies were partially or privately owned and the socialist party only rescued it to save these private owners investments.

      Liberal economics would actually be telling them to go fuck themselves and give no money to them.

      • алсааас [she/they]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Socialism is defined as the working people either directly owning or democratically controlling the economy. I don’t see how that is the case in any “socialist” country at the moment (speaking of the nordic ones, Portugal, China etc)

          • алсааас [she/they]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Imma bring up an example to maybe explain it easier. North Korea calls itself the “Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea”. In their official understanding/rhetoric they have a democracy in which the administration acts in the interest of the people instead of a few bureaucratic elites. In reality it’s the other way around. Now, if someone said “Look at what democracy does to a country!!11!”, would you not object?